A little bit of magic for a drizzly Monday morning (unless of course it's sunny everywhere but Britain...) comes to you courtesy of NASA.com and features a phenomenon called the equivalence principle. Back in the 16th century, Galileo Galilei rolled spheres made of different materials down a long slope, and showed that even though the spheres were very different, they reached the bottom of the slope at the same time. He concluded that gravity accelerates all objects equally regardless of their masses or the materials from which they are made. This 36 year old video shows astronaut David Scott, demonstrating just that, by standing on the moon and dropping a
heavy geological hammer and a light falcon feather. Both items hit the
ground at the same time, reinforcing Galileo's theory.
The experiment shown in the above video isn't necessarily the most accurate scientific demonstration (nor is it brilliant quality, unsurprisingly), but it was the first such demonstration to be done on the moon, and it's very eye-catching. Even though you know the outcome, it's just impossible to make your brain accept that the hammer and the feather will fall at the same rate. And yet they do.




We depend on the Sun for life, but it an unpredictable master. Every now and again it flings out bundles of joy known as 





If you have to work to earn your crust, it's important that the people you work with are a nice bunch. Your colleagues can make or break your job, working with great people makes a mediocre job acceptable, and working with a bunch of berks will ruin any fantastic role in the end. But the fact remains that you can always walk away from your workmates at the end of the day, unless of course you work in an enclosed space. Say for example a space shuttle. Cooped up in a tin can miles above the earth's surface, it's doubly important that your colleagues are sane, so after astronaut Lisa Nowak
Most of us could manage to be a bit greener in our lives. Whether that means not eating Chilean strawberries in winter, not flying around the world quite so much, or just replacing some of our lightbulbs with energy efficient ones, we could do more. But who should be compelling us to do so? It's reasonably clear that most people don't bother to make such efforts when left to their own devices. But does that mean that the government should intervene and start making non-green things illegal? Australia's government is just about to do exactly that, and ban normal incadescent lightbulbs in favour of the energy efficient equivalent (via 


